To facilitate communication with project and operations personnel, it is desirable to add a CIAD and a CIND diagram to the usual diagrams such as P&IDs, Loop Diagrams, Control Logic Diagrams, etc.
The Control and Information Architecture Diagram (CIAD) communicates an overview of the physical architecure of the enterprise systems and networks from the plant sensors and control devices to the corporate board room.
The Control and Information Network Diagram (CIND) provides a graphic view of all control, HMI, network devices, and how they are connected. This includes redundancy, communication rates, and protocols. Identical end devices such as workstations, PLCs, radios, etc., may be shown in tables (see CIND Example).
It is important to stanardize what is represented on each type of diagram in order to speed understanding among the many personnel who use them.
Based on experience with many PERA projects, we propose the following:
The Control and Information Architecture Diagram should include:
The CIAD is developed during the Conceptual Engineering Phase, in parallel with the Process Flow Diagram (PFD) or Mechanical Flow Diagram (MFD).
Here is an example CIAD from a typical process industry facility.
This second CIAD example shows a Safety Instrumented System (SIS) as well as how ISA 62443 "Zones and Conduits" may be combined with PERA Levels.
The Control and Information Network Diagram Is more detailed, and should include the following:
The CIND is developed during the Preliminary Engineering Phase, in parallel with the P&ID.
Like the P&ID, CIND diagrams are used in HAZOPs and audits, so they must be precise and regularly updated.
Here is an example CIND from a process industry facility that includes warehouses and major project offices.